|
Printer Friendly Version

51 mm Project M2.pdf
|
51
mm Project
M-3
|
"An expert is
a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow
field."
Niels Bohr
1922 Nobel Laureate in Physics |
 |
|
Failures during the M2 test
1 Failure of the proximal thrust chamber close
to the attachment of the chamber pressure monitor.
2 The microphone attached to the nitrous vent did
not detect venting.
|
|
Refinements for the M3 test
1 Angling of the nitrous jets towards the centre of the
fuel grain.
2 Bevelling the proximal end of the fuel grain.
3
Gluing the fuel
grain to the Tufnol liner to prevent gas entering the gap and eroding the
liner.
4
Abandoning the
microphone system.
|
 |
 |
|
Modified Injector with Ducting of the Oxidiser to Improve
Axial Flow |
Original Injector Unit "straight flow" Configeration |
|
Test Data Overall this third test
was more successful with a longer duration of burn. The
modifications to the injector end of the thrust chamber seemed to have
worked. However after 3.1s there was a loss of thrust despite
the continued flow of nitrous oxide.
|
 Figure 1:
|

Photo 1:-Click to run video |
The loss of
thrust was due to the nozel retainer being ejected from the thrust
chamber. This was followed by the fuel grain which can be seen on
the stills from the video (Figure 1, 3.87 s & 4.17s, arrow heads). The nozel retainer was susequently found
(figure 2) and was clearly very badly damaged during the test.
When compared with figure 3 it is clear that most of the color which held
the retainer in place has been lost. Some of the damge could
be due to the retainer being ejected downwards and impacting the blast
deflector of the stand. In fact the retainer is now distorted into
an oval shape which would fit with this hypothesis. However
inspection of a grub screw recocered at the same time reviels melting
(figure 2 arrow, an intact screw is shown for comparison). This
would suggest that heating of this structure was the original cause of the
failure. Figure 3 shows that the retainer is in direct contact with
the graphite nozel. As graphite conducts heat well, the proximetry of the
nozel to the retainer would acount for the failure. |
|

Figure2: Post firing nozel retainer and retaining grub
screws. The grub screw indicated by the arrow has melted.
|

Figure 3: Nozel retainer and tufnol liner |
|
Modifications for the M4
1 Redesigning the nozel reatiner to protect it from
heating.
2 Fabricating a fatter oxidiser tank.
|